pki.sgit.ai / documents / grant-vs-mandate

Grant Is Not Mandate: The Gap Between Them Is Exposure Nobody Accepted

TypeStrategy brief Versionv0.33.61 Date20 August 2026 AuthorDinis Cruz (project lead) and collaborators LicenceCC BY 4.0 Sourceraw markdown · view on GitHub

Summary

Superseded in place by a sharpened same-day version, which adds the argument below on prohibitions. A vocabulary split with a measurement inside it: a grant is the union of capabilities conferred at assignment, a mandate is what the holder is authorised and expected to do, and in practice the first is much larger than the second. The difference — excess authority — is blast radius measured from the other end, and it is unaccepted by construction, so it defaults to critical and escalates without anybody escalating it. The brief corrects a 17 July claim (to grant is to mandate — they coincide only in the rare case), gives a mandate its five required fields (issuer, subject, scope, interval, revocation path — a mandate with no interval is a grant wearing a mandate's name), separates enforcement (an execution broker, where grant and mandate coincide by construction) from instrumentation (a declared mandate, honest only when called that), and notes an instruction in a chat is not a mandate at all.

Key concepts

Key ideas

On this site

Folded into the registry MVP pack as change-control entry C1 — the grant redefinition that makes excess authority the registry's countable product.

Read the document

📄 Original document · v0.33.61 · 20 August 2026 · rendered from the raw markdown (the source of truth)