pki.sgit.ai / documents / name-the-question

Name The Question Rather Than The Concept: A Surprise Is An Action Outside The Grant, So The Assessment Is Falsifiable, And The Scan Cannot Run From Outside

TypeStrategy brief — sixth of 4 September; naming candidates tested against the corpus, availability not checked Versionv0.33.64 Date4 September 2026 AuthorDinis Cruz (project lead) and collaborators LicenceCC BY 4.0 Sourceraw markdown · view on GitHub

Summary

The memo asks for a name for the gap, a public site that lets anybody measure their own, and the commercial model. Tested against the corpus, every clean naming candidate is obscure and every familiar one collides, so the recommendation is not to coin a noun: the technical term stays excess authority and the public phrase is a sentence, what you authorised and never asked for. Two ideas do real work. A surprise is an action outside the grant and never a wrong action inside it, which makes the assessment falsifiable: zero surprises over a period means the measurement held. And the precedent services could scan you from outside, while agent exposure cannot be seen from outside, so the site hosts the questions and the interpretation and the measurement runs in the user's environment. The assessment expires when a vendor moves a default; the commercial model is free through level three and paid where somebody's own environment is modelled. Built here as /authorised/.

Key concepts

Key ideas

On this site

Adds /authorised/ (index.html, app.js, README.md with the precedents record), assets/authorised.css, and the bench entry.

Read the document

📄 Original document · v0.33.64 · 4 September 2026 · rendered from the raw markdown (the source of truth)